Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Field Day 2


As Day 1 was spent on the not very rewarding (but extremely important) work of laying out our baselines, we didn't get to break the dirt at all until Day 2. Above, you can see one of the three shovel test pits (STPs) we planned out at 20 feet intervals, five feet off of the EW baseline. 

Below, Pat, Dene, and I are positioning the stakes using triangulation. I am convinced this is the hardest part.


While we were working on the STPs, John took some measurements around the church site with a corer. The corer can be used to find obstructions beneath the surface that may indicate a feature, a foundation wall, or (in our case) a buried gravestone. After comparing old photographs of the cemetery (taken around the 1890s) to its appearance today, Susan noted that many of the stones have gone missing; it's possible that they fell where they stood and were buried.


Back to the STPs. Pat, Claudia, and I excavated STP 1. As expected, the first two levels (including the topsoil) revealed hardly any finds at all. At the end of Level 2, however, we started to find large amounts of pea gravel that seemed to suggest we had hit the long path that once extended from the entrance of the cemetery to the nineteenth-century St. Mark's Church. This gravel was also found in STP 2.


Here, we use a Munsell Color Book to categorize the color of the soil we unearthed from Level 1. As an excavator, it is important to become familiar with the appearance and texture of soil as it will allow you to discern subtle changes that distinguish different strata or that may indicate a feature or some sort of disturbance caused by human action. Identification of the different strata (or layers) in an excavation - known as stratigraphy - is essential to understanding the chronology of the site and placing the artifacts and features in context.


Below you can see Claudia, Pat, and I working on STP 1 while Dene brings over a bucket of dirt from STP 2. All of the dirt was sifted through a quarter inch mesh shaker screen. In addition to the gravel, we found several small finds (in our unit, they were mostly from level 3), including pieces of glass and coal and one square nail (pictured below). STPs are great for obtaining a "snapshot" of the site underground. Since you can't dig the whole site (usually), and you don't want to dig randomly, you can use STPs to decide what areas are worth excavating.


Below you can see the aforementioned nail. It was a very exciting find! Our plans for Day 3 include completing our existing STPs and opening new ones and perhaps beginning the excavation of a possible dry well in between the St. George's and St. Mark's Church sites (I will try to get a map in here of some kind so that you can see how the two sites relate to one another).

6 comments:

  1. Love it! A great, educational review of the process and the day! Laurie

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. Just so we can form a more accurate picture, would you enlighten us as to how big a shovel test pit is.

    2. I note you say '...the not very rewarding (but extremely important) work...' where another might have said 'the extremely important, though not very rewarding, work.' The amateur psychologist bit of me is working on this one.

    3. Was it a Protestant mesh shaker screen?

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. An STP is 20 in x 20 in.

    2. I can only comment on one -ology at a time.

    3. The shaker screen, also known as the United Society of Believers screen, is Protestant. The stationary screens are mainline Protestants. If the screen is over 60 years old, chances are it's a Quaker screen.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought of posting a smiley, but couldn't bring myself to do so. Have a high five instead. Whatever I pitch, you hit. Your mother must be proud of you.

    Where is your mother, by the way? Baking a cake? What?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Madeline,

    I just came across your blog. It's awesome and filled with interesting stories from the area. I just learned about the restoration project. I cannot tell you how excited I am to hear about it. I grew up in Chappaqua and passed by the cemetery as a kid, never paying any attention to it. Now, as an avid genealogist, I have found myself visiting the cemetery numerous times. My wife has one direct line group of family members buried there and others that are cousins. I live in CT now, but am in the area fairly frequently visiting my Mom in Katonah. I have also presented a couple of genealogy programs for the Chappaqua Historical Society.

    I have some extensive research on some of my wife's relatives that are buried there should you ever be interested in it, including some vital records. One of the first set of stones that you are greeted with as you enter the main gate off of 117 are the Cutlers. One of those stones is that of a 17 year old girl who I may have acquired an old daguerreotype photograph of from a collector.

    I also have a great newspaper resource for research of others who died between 1877 and 1891 should you want it.

    Again, thanks for all you and the other volunteers do.

    Phil Hayes
    Monroe, CT
    http://www.hayesfamily.us

    You can email me using "Phil@" the domain name above (without the www) should you want to talk.

    ReplyDelete
  6. LOL... having read your blog further,it clear appears you have already discovers the Fulton Newspaper Website.

    ReplyDelete