Showing posts with label Lane. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lane. Show all posts

Saturday, April 13, 2013

22: Eddie Sarles

Grave of Eddie Sarles
This little child's grave was unearthed during our clean-up. It belongs to Eddie Sarles, son of Abijah and Lucinda J. Sarles, who died on July 28, 1872, at the age of 9 months and 9 days.

Abijah Sarles was born in 1825, and his wife, Lucinda J. Lane, was born in 1833. In 1860, Abijah was a mason, and he and Lucinda had two children, Stephen and Nancy.

1860 US Federal Census

Ten years later, the family was living with Abijah's 84-year-old father Philip.

1870 US Federal Census
One year later, Lucinda gave birth to Eddie, who died nine months later. Here I begin to wonder about Abijah and Lucinda's children. Their first three children, Stephen, Nancy, and Maria, were born between 1856 and 1863. Then eight years passed before Lucinda gave birth to her fourth child. Considering that these were the days before reliable birth control, this seems unusual. Did Abijah and Lucinda have other children between Maria and Eddie who died? I would expect that if they had, these children would be buried in the cemetery, but I don't find any. I'm not sure there's really a way to fully answer this question.

In 1880, the Sarleses and their three surviving children were living together still. Twenty-three-year-old Stephen was a clerk in a drug store.

1880 US Federal Census.
Abijah Sarles died in 1898. He and Lucinda aren't buried in the cemetery. By the time they died, several decades after the death of Eddie, the cemetery was in rather poor shape, and many people were choosing to be buried in a nearby, larger, and more well-maintained cemetery. Of course, fifty years later, that cemetery had fallen into disrepair, prompting my own great-grandparents to buy a plot for themselves in Kensico Cemetery in Valhalla instead. Now I pass them, and my grandparents, every day on the train.

Grave of Abijah Sarles (source)
The 1900 census doesn't do much to help solve the mystery of the Sarles children. It says that 66-year-old Lucinda Sarles was the mother of two children, two of whom were living. It is certainly possible that only two of her children were living at this point, but we know that she had at least four children.

1900 US Federal Census
I think the 1910 census is closest to the truth - four Sarles children, three living. This still doesn't explain the large gap in age between the two youngest children. Perhaps Lucinda was pregnant and miscarried, or perhaps she simply didn't, for whatever reason, conceive between the ages of 30 and 38. The only reason I'm interested is that this family represents a break from the usual 19th-century pattern of births every two years from marriage till menopause.

Abijah and Lucinda's daughters didn't marry, nor did the census record any occupations for them. Lucinda was said to be living off her "own income," so perhaps they owned a farm.

1910 US Federal Census
Lucinda last appears in the 1915 census at the age of 82. She died in 1917.

1915 New York State Census
Grave of Lucinda J. Lane Sarles (source)
The two sisters, Nancy and Maria, who seem to have gone by their middle names of Jane/Jennie and Eloise respectively, were still living together in 1920, at 31 Manchester Terrace. Nancy Jane died in 1927 and was buried beside her parents.

Grave of N. Jennie Sarles (source)
In 1930, Maria Eloise was living by herself in a home she owned at 42 Manchester Terrace, which had a value of $25,000. She died in 1940 and was buried near her sister and parents.

Grave of Maria Eloise Sarles (source)
What of the Sarleses' only surviving son, Stephen? He outlived both of his sisters and in 1940 he was living at 86 West Main Street, just one street over from where his sisters had lived, with his 55-year-old daughter Elizabeth Benedict. Both father and daughter had been widowed.

Forty years earlier, Stephen and his wife Emma Matthews had been living with his mother Lucinda and two sisters. Somehow, I missed them when I looked up Lucinda, though they were right there! Stephen was a druggist, and Elizabeth was their only daughter.

1900 US Federal Census
Elizabeth married Creswell Benedict, a jeweller/optician who was 16 years her senior. I have to wonder if she knew my great-grandmother, who lived in the town at the same time, and also married a much older man who owned his own business. In fact, my great-grandmother would have been about ten years younger than Elizabeth, and my great-grandfather about ten years younger than Creswell.

Creswell died in 1920, and he and Elizabeth don't seem to have had children. Elizabeth lived with her father until his death in 1944, and for another 37 years after that, dying in 1981 at age 96 - six years before my great-grandmother died.

Eddie Sarles seems to be the only one in this family to have been buried in the cemetery. All of the others were buried in the other, larger cemetery. Abijah and Lucinda don't seem to have any living descendants, although they have a multitude of cousins.

  1. Abijah A. Sarles (1825-1898) m. Lucinda J. Lane (1833-1917)
    1. Stephen H. Sarles (1856-1944) m. Emma E. Matthews (1860-1922) in 1884
      1. Elizabeth Sarles (1885-1981) m. Creswell Benedict (1869-1920)
    2. Nancy Jennie Sarles (1859-1927)
    3. Maria Eloise Sarles (1863-1940)
    4. Eddie Sarles (1871-1872)

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

18: The Lane Family (updated)

Lane monument (source)
Update: Claudia, who saw this post via Facebook, was able to find the 1876 obituaries of William H. Lane and Albert S. Lane. The latter died of "typhoid pneumonia," and the former of "pneumonia." It seems plausible that all three of the Lanes who died in 1876 suffered from typhoid. She also alerted me to several Lanes on the 1914 cemetery transcript that I missed; their information is in the family tree at the bottom of the post.
 
This large obelisk commemorates four members of the Lane family: William H. and Eliza A. Lane and their two sons, Albert S. and William H. Jr. Father and sons all died in 1876 - the same kind of multiple family tragedy that wiped out four Baker children in the years between 1868-1871 and three members of the Babcock family within five months in 1861-2.

The most probable culprit is infectious disease. Living in close quarters, with little knowledge of how disease spread and little means of treating it once it occurred, the people of the nineteenth century were in many ways helpless. The monuments they erected to the dead - some small and humble, some large and ornate, and some, like the Lane monument, large and austere - gave family members some semblance of control. They may not have been able to stop their loved ones from dying, but they could shape the way they would be remembered after their deaths.

In 1850, William and his wife Eliza had eight children ranging in age from one to eighteen years. He was a merchant.
1850 US Federal Census
Twenty years later, the house had been emptied of children, with the exception of youngest daughter Emma, 19. Sixty-year-old William ran a restaurant.

1870 US Federal Census
Six years later came the dreadful year that saw the deaths of William, William Jr., and Albert Lane.

Albert S. Lane had served in the Civil War. He was discharged with a disability in September 1861 at Alexandria, Virginia. I can't find him in the 1870 census, so I don't know if he was ever married. He died at age 36 in New Jersey.

William H. Lane Jr. also served in the Civil War. He mustered out in May 1865. In the muster roll abstracts, he is said to have gray eyes, brown hair, a fair complexion, and to be 5'7.5" in height. I can't find him in the census either, but William Lane is a terribly common name. He died at age 30.

Eliza A. Lane is similarly difficult to find in the 1880 census, although I know that she lived until 1890.

William H. Lane Sr. was the defendant in a legal case regarding his restaurant in the 1870s. From this I found that his restaurant was located at the corner of Hall Place and Seventh Street in Manhattan, and that Albert S. Lane was also involved in the restaurant. It's long and complicated, but one interesting tidbit was that William H. Lane couldn't be reached for his testimony at the time because he was sick (the case was written up in 1877; this was probably the sickness that killed him). In any case, he seems to have won the case.

Hall Place has since been renamed Taras Shevchenko Place - so according to Google Maps, this seems to be the general area where William's restaurant stood. I wonder if William ever stopped to get a drink at McSorley's Old Ale House, established 1854.
East 7th Street, NY, NY
I tried to find out more about William Lane's restaurant. I found this in a real estate record from 1870:

Real Estate Record 1870
I'll have to do some further research to see if I can trace the Lanes any further.
  1. William H. Lane (1807-1876) m. Eliza A. (1808-1890)
    1. Harriet Lane (1832-)
    2. Francis B. Lane (1835-)
    3. Hannah M. Lane (1838-)
    4. Albert S. Lane (1840-1876)
    5. William H. Lane (1841-1841)
    6. Elizabeth Lane (1844-)
    7. Charles Wesley Lane (1845-1855)
    8. William H. Lane (1847-1876)
    9. Mary A. Lane (1849-1862)
    10. Emma J. Lane (1851-)