Showing posts with label Sands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sands. Show all posts

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Matilda K. Sands Sherwood

Detail of the gate of the Sands family plot
In one of my early posts, I wrote that Gilbert Marten, who died in 1854 at the age of 90, was probably the oldest person buried in the cemetery. I may have been wrong. Matilda K. Sands Sherwood, who died at the age of 92, was older, according to the transcription of the cemetery conducted in 1914. The transcription gives Matilda's birthdate as March 3, 1810 and her date of death as December 17, 1902. However, different censuses suggest different years of birth for Matilda, ranging from 1817 to 1827. For several decades, she seems to have gotten younger by the year.

Women buried in the Episcopal Cemetery died on average 2.7 years later than men. By my calculations, life expectancy for women in the cemetery was slightly but consistently greater for women - the opposite of the national trend throughout the nineteenth century. So it would be appropriate (but not necessary) for Matilda to be two years older than Marten, who is probably the longest-lived man in the cemetery.

I have to rely on the 1914 transcription for Matilda's dates of birth and death because I have not yet identified her stone. I know where the Sherwood plot is - it's located directly behind the Sands plot in the Methodist section of the cemetery. I haven't seen Matilda's stone, though, and I have a sneaking suspicion it's this one.

Grave of Matilda Sands and Daniel Sherwood?
Matilda's husband was Daniel W. Sherwood, a minister who was born in Connecticut in 1820 and ordained in the Patterson Baptist Church in 1844 or 1845. They had one son (whom I know of), Joseph, born in 1846. In 1850, the family lived in East Fishkill, New York. Matilda's age was given as 33, which would place her year of birth around 1817.

1850 US Federal Census
In 1860, the Sherwoods were living in Saugerties, New York. In one decade, Matilda had aged only five years, going from 33 to 38. This meant that in 1860 she was younger than her husband, while in 1850 she had been older.

1860 US Federal Census
In 1870, the Sherwoods were living in Northfield, Staten Island, with two new family members: Joseph's wife Adelia and their child Jesse, who had been born that May. Joseph was working as an apothecary. A notable error in the 1870 census is that Jesse is listed as a girl, when he was in fact a boy, as indicated by all subsequent censuses.

For the second time, Matilda had only aged five years in a decade - going from 38 to 43.

1870 US Federal Census
The next decade was particularly rough on Daniel and Matilda, as it aged them each by about twenty years. Either that or the Sherwoods were becoming more comfortable in revealing their actual ages. Matilda, who had been 43 in 1870, was 61 in 1880. The couple lived in Farmers Mill, Putnam County, New York, with their servant Cordelia Light.

1880 US Federal Census
Meanwhile, Joseph and Adelia Sherwood were still living in Staten Island. They had suffered the loss of their one-year-old son Clayton in 1875, and buried him in the cemetery. The couple's surviving children were Jessie and Edith.

1880 US Federal Census
Daniel Sherwood died in the house of his son in Shandaken, New York, in 1898; his obituary stated that he was "about 80 years old." In 1900, Matilda was living with her son's family in Shandaken. Her age is given as 88 and her birth year as 1812.

1900 US Federal Census
Matilda died on December 17, 1902. According to the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, she left her son Joseph $5,000 in real estate and $10,000 in personal estate.

Ages of Matilda Sherwood
Out of curiosity, I made this little chart to see how Matilda "aged" over the years. As you can see, her estimated birth year - based on the age she gave to the census enumerator - gets steadily later between 1850 and 1870. In 1880, her estimated birth year drops down to 1819 - still two years later than the census of 1850 would suggest. Matilda's year of birth is given outright in the census of 1900 as 1812. This is the closest to the year (1810) given in the transcription, and probably the closest to the truth.

By 1910, Joseph and Adelia were back in Staten Island and were living alone. His occupation was given simply as "own income." I'm guessing that meant that he and Adelia still had plenty of his inheritance left to live on.

Joseph and Adelia's son Jesse married Inez Doyle in 1896. In 1900, they were living in Manhattan with their children, Thelma and Daniel, and Jesse was working as a bookkeeper. They had lost one child.

1900 US Federal Census
By 1910, Jesse and Inez had moved to West Pittston, Pennsylvania. This census reveals that Jesse's son Daniel's middle name was Merritt. Jessie also had a younger son named after his brother Clayton who died in 1875. Inez was now said to be the mother of five children, three of whom were living. Jesse was a clerk in a "DLYW Office." His sister Edith Sherwood Smith and her husband Frank lived with them.

1910 US Federal Census
In 1920, Jesse's mother Adelia had moved in with them, presumably after Joseph had died. Jesse's son Daniel Merritt Sherwood, age 20, was now known simply as Merritt, bringing the Merritt Count up to six. Jesse was working as a clerk for a steam railroad company, as was his 22-year-old daughter Thelma. Son Merritt was working as a wagon driver for an "Express Co.," and Edith Smith was a seamstress.

1920 US Federal Census
Jesse died sometime in the 1920s. In 1930, Inez was living with her son Daniel Merritt Sherwood, who was divorced, and daughter Thelma Sherwood Keller in Douglas, California. Thelma had two sons. Daniel worked as a salesman in a bakery.

1930 US Federal Census
To return to Matilda K. Sands: I wonder whether she was a daughter of Merritt Sands and Elizabeth Kirby. They have four children buried in the cemetery, all of whom were born between 1810 and 1820. There is also an Abram Sands buried in the cemetery who was born in 1812 and died in 1901; could he be a son of Merritt and Elizabeth? More investigation will be needed to find out.

  1. Daniel W. Sherwood (1820-1898) m. Matilda K. Sands (1810?-1902)
    1. Joseph L. Sherwood (1846-) m. Adelia F. (1852-1920) in 1868
      1. Jessie M. Sherwood (1870-) m. Inez Doyle (1872-1957) in 1896
        1. Thelma Sherwood (1897-) m. Eugene Keller
          1. Eugene C. Keller (1922-)
          2. Winfield Doyle Keller (1926-2002)
        2. Daniel Merritt Sherwood (1899-1952)
        3. Clayton Sherwood (1903-) m. Nan (1907-)
          1. Sherie Sherwood (1930-)
      2. Edith M. Sherwood (1873-) m. Frank Smith (1871-)
      3. Clayton E. Sherwood (1875-1876)

Friday, April 26, 2013

27: The Dr. Leggetts

Grave of Dr. Robert Leggett
Dr. Robert Leggett and Dr. Joseph Leggett had many things in common. To begin with, they were brothers; they were doctors; they were Irish immigrants; and they each married a daughter of Merritt and Elizabeth Kirby Sands (and yes, Merritt Sands is now the third man connected with the cemetery with the first name Merritt. The others are Merritt Brundage and Merritt Hewlett. It's getting a little out of hand). The doctors and their wives are all buried in the cemetery.

The Dr. Leggetts are the second and third doctors I have investigated in this project; the first, of course, being Dr. Enoch Greene, subject of my first post. Robert Leggett was fifteen years older than Dr. Greene, and Joseph was one year older than Dr. Greene. Living and working in New York City and Westchester County, they must have known each other.

Robert Leggett was born in Ireland on March 5, 1805. He married Mary Ann Sands, who was born around 1810. Joseph Leggett, born in Ireland on March 22, 1819, married Mary's younger sister Esther R. Sands, who was born in 1820.

I think I will tackle this chronologically.

1850
In 1850, Robert and Mary Leggett were living in Manhattan with their two sons, James and Leonard. Mary may have married an Irishman, but she wasn't about to abandon the great Westchester County WASP tradition of giving sons names like Leonard, Kirby, or Merritt. Cynthia Sands was Mary and Esther's sister.

1850 US Federal Census
In 1850, Joseph and Esther were also living in Manhattan, but Joseph is listed as a druggist, not a physician. Mary and Esther's mother Elizabeth Kirby Sands was living with them.


1860
I can't find Robert and Mary Ann Leggett in the 1860 census, and I have a theory as to why, which I'll reveal as you read on.

In 1860 Joseph was now a fully-fledged doctor - and a quite successful one, judging by his personal and real estate. Elizabeth Kirby Sands was still living with him and Esther, along with a "Mary Ann Sands" - is this actually Mary Ann Sands Leggett? She's the right age, and, of course, she's Esther's sister, which might lead to the census taker giving her the same surname as their mother, Elizabeth Sands. It's a little bit strange, though - where was Robert? Catharine G. Sands is presumably another one of Elizabeth's daughters.

1860 US Federal Census
Elizabeth Kirby Sands died in 1862, and Mary Ann Sands Leggett in 1863.

1870
I can't find Robert Leggett in the 1870 census either, but I did find Joseph and Esther. Now living in Mount Pleasant, Robert was a farmer. Cynthia Sands had moved to the country along with them.

1870 US Federal Census
Robert Leggett died on August 19, 1873, and Joseph on September 1, 1873. It's my best guess that they died of the same infectious disease.

Searching for more information outside of the census, I found this snippet in The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record, Vol. 47:

NYG&B Record Vol. 47
This gave me the name of the third son of Robert and Mary Ann Leggett ... sigh ... Merritt Leggett. This brings the Merritt tally up to four. Mary Elizabeth and Adelaide Elizabeth are the daughters of one of these sons, but which one is not certain. There is a Merritt Leggett buried in the cemetery, but get this: it's Merritt Leggett Junior. If we look at the 1870 census:

1870 US Federal Census
Merritt Leggett Senior here is the son of Robert and Mary Leggett and, like his father, went into the medical field in New York City. Merritt and his wife Charlotte's children are Henrietta and Merritt Junior. It's Merritt Junior who is buried in the cemetery. Total Merritt count: FIVE.

While searching for this information, I also discovered why Robert Leggett had seemingly disappeared from the census, while his wife lived without him.

This is the New York Tribune from 1849:

This is the New York Sun from 1859-1861:


These articles raise a lot of questions that I can't answer, and give a rather sad note to the history of the Leggett family.

Esther died in 1899, and her sister Cynthia in 1900. Mary, Esther, and Cynthia's brother Jesse M. Sands, a Civil War veteran, is also buried in the cemetery. He married Elizabeth Florence; they died in 1867 and 1874 respectively.

Graves of Elizabeth Florence and Jesse M. Sands
Most popular names:
Merritt (3)

Surnames used as first names: Merritt Sands, Leonard Leggett, Merritt Leggett
  1. Merritt Sands m. Elizabeth Kirby (1786-1862)
    1. Mary Ann Sands (1810-1863) m. Dr. Robert Leggett (1805-1873)
      1. James Leggett (1831-)
      2. Leonard Leggett (1835-)
      3. Merritt S. Leggett (1836-) m. Charlotte (1838-)
        1. Merritt Leggett (1857-1890)
        2. Henrietta Leggett (1860-)
    2. Cynthia Jane Sands (1816-1900)
    3. Jesse M. Sands (1818-1867) m. Elizabeth Florence (1826-1874)
    4. Esther R. Sands (1820-1899) m. Dr. Joseph Leggett (1819-1873)

Sunday, April 14, 2013

24: Susan Emily Woolsey

Grave of Susan Emily Woolsey (source)
There are six Woolseys buried in the cemetery, four of whom died in the 1850s. The grave of the youngest Woolsey is perhaps the most poignant: it commemorates Susan Emily Woolsey, only child of Jonathan and Maria Woolsey, who died in 1859, four years after the death of her father.

Jonathan Woolsey's father, Jonathan Sr., died the year that Jonathan Jr. was born, making him the last of ten children by Jonathan's mother, Susanna Carstang. Susanna's parents were Gideon Carstang (1751-1817) and Catharine Fowler. Gideon Carstang was a descendant of Gideon Carstang, a rope maker born in the 1680s who lived at Philipsburgh Manor, and his wife Catherina Cockefer, a woman of Dutch descent.

In 1850, 25-year-old Jonathan Woolsey Jr., a cartman, was living in Manhattan with his wife Maria, 24. According to the census, they had been married that year. They shared their apartment with 14-year-old Hannah Nickinson, a servant. Their daughter Susan was yet to be born.

In 1851, the succession of Woolsey deaths began with the death of Susanna Carstang Woolsey. Her son Jonathan died in 1855; his grave is inscribed: "By his wife Maria this stone was placed." Jonathan's brother Joseph died in 1858, and finally Jonathan's daughter Susan died in 1859. As always, I wonder if the same disease carried both of them off.

What of Jonathan and Susanna's eight other children?

Catharine Woolsey, the couple's first child, was born in 1806 and died in 1809.

Isaac Woolsey, born 1810, was a boat captain. The year before she died, Susanna was living with him, his wife Marietta Bird, his unmarried sister Mary, and his son Alonzo in Ossining. Alonzo later became a guard at Sing Sing Prison, though not at the same time as Amos Babcock.

1850 US Federal Census
Mary Woolsey, born 1816, married Gilead Holmes, who owned a furniture store. They had two children, Charles and Marietta. In 1870 they were housing their niece, Susan, and in 1880, Susan's father Daniel. Mary died in 1893.

Susanna Woolsey, born 1821, married Valentine Cox, a miller, and lived in Lewisboro. They had five children. Susanna died in 1889. After his wife's death, Valentine moved in with his widowed daughter, Mary Church, and her house full of Churches.

Daniel Woolsey, born 1823, was a shoemaker who married Mary Sands. By coincidence, they also happened to have a daughter Susan Woolsey who was born around 1850. In 1870, Susan was living with her aunt Mary Holmes. By 1880, Susan had moved out, but now Daniel was living with Mary, her husband Gilead Holmes, and their son Charles. Both Daniel and Charles worked as clerks in Gilead's furniture store. However, in 1896, he was admitted to the Westchester County Poorhouse as "sick and destitute." He was recorded as having two brothers living, but the number "2" was then crossed out. Two children were living, though.

I have seen many people - either those buried in the cemetery or their relatives - who were in the Westchester County Poorhouse at one point in their lives. This was a time before nursing homes, hospices, or home health aids, and so many of the people who wound up in the poorhouse were simply old and sick and unable to take care of themselves. They might have had family, but family members might have been ill-equipped to take care of them. Without knowing more details, I can't really judge Daniel's family who were unable to give him a place to live in 1896.

I realized that I've been forgetting to count the most popular given names in each family. So here are the most popular names in the Woolsey family:

Mary/Maria (6)
Susanna/Susan (5)
Catharine (3)
Marietta (2)
Jonathan (2)
Charles (2)
Carrie (2)
  1. Jonathan Woolsey (1783-1826) m. Susanna Carstang (1786-1851) in 1805
    1. Catharine Woolsey (1806-1809)
    2. Joseph B. Woolsey (1807-1858) 
    3. Isaac Woolsey (1810-1856) m. Marietta E. Bird (1815-)
      1. Alonzo B. Woolsey (1839-1914) m. Carrie M. Ackerman (1841-before 1910)
        1. Charles Woolsey (1864-1880)
        2. Carrie Edna Woolsey (1874-1914)
    4. James Woolsey (1812-)
    5. Catharine Woolsey (1814-)
    6. Mary Woolsey (1816-1893) m. Gilead Holmes (1824-)
      1. Charles Holmes (1856-)
      2. Marietta Holmes (1858-1935) m. Marcus Washburn (1853-) in 1887
        1. Harold Holmes Washburn (1891-)
    7. Sarah Woolsey (1819-)
    8. Susanna Woolsey (1821-1889) m. Valentine Cox (1822-1903)
      1. Mary J. Cox (1849-)
      2. Sarah F. Cox (1851-)
      3. Maria L. Cox (1853-)
      4. Ellen B. Cox (1858-) m. Francis B. Church (1855-)
        1. Susannah Church (1876-) m. Young
          1. Mary E. Young (1909-)
        2. Clarence E. Church (1878-) m. Catherine Ward (1877-) in 1898
          1. Elsie I. Church (1899-)
        3. Ernest Church (1880-) m. Frances (1877-)
          1. Ellwood B. Church (1904-1974) m. Helen Cone (1905-)
            1. Shirley H. Church (1925-)
            2. Norma M. Church (1928-)
      5. Georgeanna Cox (1859-)
    9. Daniel Woolsey (1823-) m. Mary Sands (1823-before 1880)
      1. Susan Woolsey (1849-)
    10. Jonathan Woolsey (1826-1855) m. Maria (1827-) in 1850
      1. Susan Emily Woolsey (1850-1859)

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

6: Josie and Willie


According to the cemetery transcription from 1914, five-year-old Josie and two-year-old Willie were  children of W. T. and Jane H. M. Sands (this information was written on the gravestone, but is almost completely illegible now). They died within ten days of each other in May 1864.

There are seven other Sandses buried in the cemetery, but none of them are Josie and Willie's parents. I identified the family in the 1860 census. Josie was in fact Joseph A. Sands, and his parents were Walter and Jane Sands. Yes, it looks like "John" in the census (and that's how it's transcribed), but the gender given is female (and the middle initials match - H.M.).

1860 US Federal Census
Walter Sands was a shoemaker, and Joseph was at this time their only child.

Here's Walter Sands as a 20-year-old in the 1850 census. He came from a family of shoemakers! His parents seem to be Abijah and Eliza (?) Sands, and he has one sister, Maria. Abijah and Eliza aren't buried in the cemetery. It's hard to say if Maria is; she probably would have a different name. Like Sarles.

1850 US Federal Census
In 1850, it's my best guess that Jane Sands was Jane H. Merritt. I have several reasons for this. First, it would account for her initials. She's of the right age and in the right town. Then of course, there's the fact that Joseph and Mary Merritt are buried in the cemetery, along with their only son Nathan. And Jane's sister would be Emma L. - the name she would later use for her daughter.

1850 US Federal Census
Joseph and Mary Merritt both died in 1870. Nathan died in 1854 at the age of 22.

In 1870, Walter and Jane had moved to White Plains. Walter was working as a clerk in a something office. Seriously, can you read what that says? Registrar's office, maybe? At this time, they had no children.

1870 US Federal Census
Ten years later, still living in White Plains, I found something surprising. Walter and Jane were living with two young children - four-year-old Walter and nine-month-old Emma. Did Jane really give birth at the ages of 45 and 48? I suppose it's possible, but they must not have seen that coming. It would seem that, after their children's death in 1864, Walter and Jane were childless for ten years, only to have two children late in life. Either that, or they adopted. My own great-grandfather didn't have children until he was in his 50s, and it was quite a surprise, but my great-grandmother was 18 years younger.

1880 US Federal Census
Both of my great-grandparents, however, were very long-lived. Would Walter and Emma live to see their children grow up? Plenty of people in the cemetery didn't, and they weren't in their 40s when they had children.

Well, the answer seems to be yes, to some extent. Here's the whole family living together on 58 Hull Street in Brooklyn in 1892.

1892 New York State Census
Walter Jr. was working as an electrician at the age of 17. I wonder if he knew my great-grandfather, who was also an electrician in Brooklyn? He was ten years younger than Walter Jr., so it's possible their careers overlapped considerably.

In 1910 Jane was widowed and living with her 30-year-old daughter at 1646 42nd Street in Brooklyn.

1910 US Federal Census
Five years later, Emma was on her own, living and working as an assistant housekeeper at the Church Home for the Blind at 550 Washington Avenue in Brooklyn. 

1915 New York State Census
I found a listing for the home in the Annual Report of the State Board of Charities from 1911.

 
Emma was still working there in 1925, when she was listed as a nurse.

1925 New York State Census
The Church Home for the Blind was still in operation in 1947, when it was listed in a directory. Today the address is occupied by the Bedford Zion Church of the Nazarene. I wonder if it's the same building.

Bedford Zion Church - Photo by Nancy Burton
Meanwhile, Emma's brother Walter married a woman named Sarah. In 1910 they were living in Hamilton, Pennsylvania. Walter was working as an electrician, "putting up [a] power plant." By 1920, they were living in Scotch Plains, New Jersey, and Walter was working as a house electrician.

In 1930, the couple was living in Fanwood, New Jersey.

1930 US Federal Census
This census reveals that Sarah, or S. Emma, was born in Illinois, as was her mother; her father was born in Missouri, spelled "Missoura" by the census taker - the result of Sarah's accent, maybe? This time Walter was working as a proprietor of a hardware store. They lived at 315 South Avenue.

The couple, now in their 60s, was still there in 1940, and Walter was still working at the hardware store as a manager, working an average of 66 hours a week.