Showing posts with label Haines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Haines. Show all posts

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Finding Graves


Today I went to the cemetery to take some photographs for my new obsession, Find A Grave. While I have used Find A Grave for ages, I've only recently begun to add my own entries to it. At the lecture on Saturday, I met Barbara M., a member of the North Castle Historical Society who has worked with them to compile transcriptions from the town's historic cemeteries into a book. After seeing the result, I was inspired to work on the spreadsheet of transcriptions of the St. George's/St. Mark's Cemetery that I've been compiling over the past year. Find A Grave is the perfect way to keep track of all the photos I've taken for this project and access them easily.

In seeking out stones that haven't yet been photographed for Find A Grave, I found some that I'd never seen before (or at least remembered seeing). This stone is unusual - can you tell why?


As far as I know, no other stone lists only the mother on the gravestone of a child. If a stone lists one parent, it lists both. Was Elizabeth Clark a single mother?


Another mystery: Whose stone is this? I believe we found this fragment in the restoration last spring, but I have yet to match it with a name. "Joseph son of Hiram ..." is not listed in Eaderley's transcription of the 1910s, which suggests to me that the stone may have broken before then. Close by is the stone of Theodore G. Sarles, the son of Hiram and Ellen L. Sarles. Perhaps this is his brother.


Remember the Haines family? The stone of matriarch Martha Dingee Haines is nicely preserved as far as its legibility, but obviously needs a bit of work.


This is the only stone I have seen in the cemetery that has a Christogram. As you may recall, Mary and Luke Rooney were Irish immigrants. I have, however, seen it on gravestones in the nearby, contemporaneous Catholic Cemetery. Maybe someone can enlighten me - is the Christogram more of a Catholic than a Protestant symbol?


Wednesday, July 3, 2013

UPDATE: The Haines Family

Haines family monument
The Haines family monument looks like it belongs in an Edward Gorey book. It's lovely and Victorian. The front panels are occupied by the names of Alexander, Martha, John D., Lyon M. Amy, and Sarah Haines. The back panels are blank.

Martha Dingee Haines lived quite a life. Born just a few years before the birth of the country, she lived long enough to see it torn apart by Civil War. She outlived her husband Alexander by forty years. 

Grave of Alexander Haines
The four other names on the Haines monument are that of Alexander and Martha's children: Amy, Sarah, John D., and Lyon Miller Haines. Lyon died in 1835 at the age of 27.

The 1850 census reveals an unusual situation in the Haines family. None of Martha's children seem to have married. Instead, they all lived together with their mother and a laborer named William Miller. John was a farmer.

1850 US Federal Census
Twenty years later, although their mother had died, the siblings were still living together in the same house (according to an article in the Westchester Historical Society Quarterly Bulletin, this was known as the "Widow Haines House" and was built in 1815). Interestingly, Amy is listed first as the head of household, perhaps because she is the oldest, or perhaps because the property was actually in her name. Her real estate was valued at $6500, while John had his own personal estate worth $625. They lived with a farmhand named Hiram Sarles and a thirteen-year-old girl, Ellen Cutler.

1870 US Federal Census
Amy Haines died in 1877, and John in 1879. Sarah was still living in 1880, age 79, and is listed in the census as "widowed." I would expect, however, that if Sarah had been married and widowed, she would use her husband's name instead of her maiden name. It's possible that she told the census taker that she was widowed, or the census taker assumed that she was. She died in 1892, still occupying the Widow Haines House.

As always, I'm left with questions, mostly about what this family was like. Why did none of the Haines children marry? Were they reclusive, nonconformist, or simply unusual? Did they stay at home to help their widowed mother? Were they close-knit siblings who would rather live with each other than with anyone else, or were they angry and bitter at having no choice but to share their mother's house?

Also - who put up the monument to the Haines family? Judging by its design, it wasn't there in Martha's time. One of the siblings must have arranged for it, or perhaps all three of them together. Perhaps Sarah Haines, having no children, nieces, or nephews, stipulated in her will that her money should be put to such a monument after she died. It was certainly an expensive monument, possibly the largest and most elaborate in the cemetery.

The knowledge of the Haines family's story certainly changes how I view the monument. The person who arranged for it to be made would have known that the Haineses would have no descendants, and because they were not famous, the monument would ensure that the family would be remembered in centuries to come.

The monument certainly got my attention, as did the Haineses' story. I have a fondness for what I call "genealogical orphans" - that is, people who have no descendants. You see, in genealogy everyone has a mother and a father at some point, but not everyone has descendants. Since most people are mainly interested in the history of their own direct ancestors, these "orphans" are in danger of being forgotten, especially if they - like most of us - weren't famous and had just ordinary lives. It's a shame, because these people aren't any less important or interesting because they didn't reproduce. For that reason I like to "adopt" them as my non-biological ancestors and research them. Haines family, you are officially on my list.

Oh, and my personal theory is that the Haineses were a close-knit family. To me their monument suggests pride not only in the family itself, but in its closeness. They lived together and now their names are immortalized together. But that's just my take on it.

NOTE: There will be a reward for anyone who could tell me where the Widow Haines House is and whether it is still standing. In 1942, it was occupied by Reverend and Mrs. Lee M. Fairchild and was said to be on the Straus Estate. I believe that it was near Jim Wood's house. I don't know what the reward will be, but there will be one.

UPDATE: Widow Haines house found.

UPDATE #2: Dick and Laurie were kind enough to give me a copy of the article "The Haines Family of Rye and Bedford" by Estelle Hobby Haines (published in The Westchester County Historical Bulletin). Estelle's husband was a descendant of Alexander Haines's brother Solomon, who is also buried in the cemetery, and Estelle actually knew Sarah Haines. Estelle writes:
Our family is indebted to Sarah Haines, the daughter of Alexander, for preserving the information about their ancestors ... Aunt Sarah, a straight old lady with white hair, gave the documents to my husband in 1885. On special occasions she wore a broadcloth cape reaching to the floor, a magnificent garment of long ago. She often spoke of her good neighbors, the Wood Family, whom she highly esteemed. To them she rendered inestimable service when their youngest son, James Wood 2nd, was taken seriously ill. Her nursing was considered the cause of his recovery and in appreciation Phebe Underhill Wood's copy of "The Imitation of Christ" was given her and in turn Sarah Haines presented it to the oldest of Phebe's sons. The volume bears these inscriptions reminiscent of three notable characters in that part of Bedford: Phebe Wood 1852 / Sarah Haines 1856 / Presented to Henry Wood by Sarah Haines 1880."

  1. Alexander Haines (1762-1821) m. Martha Dingee (1774-1861)
    1. Amy Haines (1798-1877)
    2. Sarah Haines (1800-1892)
    3. John D. Haines (1804-1879)
    4. Lyon Miller Haines (1808-1835)

UPDATE: Another Branch of the Haines Family


Here is something interesting: a line of four gravestones all with identical willow trees. You can see another willow tree on the right behind the stone of Peter Ferris. Obviously these stones were produced in the same workshop around the same time. How are the people to whom they belong related? Well, to begin with, the people are (according to the transcriptions):

Matthew Hains
Died December 11, 1830, age 37

Sarah, wife of Levi Foshay
Died March 5, 1841, age 45

Jerusha, wife of Nehemiah M. Hains
Died March 19, 1849, age 45

Solomon S., son of N[ehemiah] Merritt and Jerusha Hains
Died July 9, 1849, age 19

Peter N. Ferris
Died April 16, 1845, age 56

Since they all died before 1850 (the year when the census first listed all people, as opposed to just the householder), the relationships are a little harder to work out, but it's still possible to make some determinations. It was very useful that I discovered this transcription of the 1845 will of Solomon Hains. This is not the Solomon S. Hains who died in 1849, but rather his grandfather.

The will mentions Solomon's sons Godfrey, Nehemiah, and Joseph Hains, and his daughter Phebe Hains, who was unmarried. Solomon wrote that he hoped that Phebe's brothers would take care of her. He also mentions the four children of his son Matthew Hains, the implication being that Matthew was already dead (in fact, he is the owner of the left-most grave, and died in 1830).

Solomon Hains (1766-1845) and his wife Hannah (1766-1817) are in fact buried in the cemetery, although their stones aren't shown in the photo above. So is their daughter Phebe E. Hains (1796-1860). Although Nehemiah's wife Jerusha (1804-1849) and son Solomon are buried in the cemetery, he is not. Nor are his brothers Godfrey and Joseph Hains.

Solomon S. Hains died of consumption, according to the 1850 mortality schedules. At the time he was living in Seneca County, New York.

I have yet to work out how Sarah Foshay and Peter Ferris are related to the Hainses.

Godfrey Hains was a farmer, and he and his wife Ann had at least three children (Phebe, Matthew, and Abraham). The couple was still living in 1880.

Could Alexander Haines, the husband of Martha Dingee, have been the brother of Solomon Hains (1766-1845)? It seems possible: Alexander was born in 1762. His grave spells the surname "Hains" (as opposed to the family monument which spells it "Haines"). But Alexander isn't mentioned in Solomon Hains's will. Of course, it's still possible that this Solomon Hains isn't the father of the Solomon Hains (1766-1845) buried in the cemetery. Interestingly, on the 1851 map, Martha Dingee Haines and Godfrey Hains are neighbors.

UPDATE: Indeed, Alexander and Solomon Hains were brothers. They were the sons of Matthew Haines, a ropemaker, and Sarah Miller. I've updated the family tree below using information taken from "The Haines Family of Rye and Bedford" by Estelle Hobby Haines, published in The Westchester County Historical Bulletin. Estelle was married to Edward Haines, a descendant of Solomon Haines (1766-1845). Thanks to Dick and Laurie for getting the article for me. I have also added information from the article to the post on the Alexander Haines family.


  1. Matthew Haines (d. 1801) m. Sarah Miller
    1. Alexander Haines (1764-1821) m. Martha Dingee (1774-1861)
      1. Amy Haines (1798-1877)
      2. Sarah Haines (1800-1892)
      3. John D. Haines (1804-1879)
      4. Lyon Miller Haines (1808-1835)
    2. Solomon Haines (1766-1845) m. (1) Hannah Merritt (1766-1817); (2) Catherine (1783-1824)
      1. Matthew Haines (1793-1830) m. Elizabeth Sutton
        1. Hannah Haines 
        2. Mary E. Haines
        3. Samuel P. Haines
      2.  Phebe E. Haines (1796-1860)
      3. Godfrey Hains (1798-) m. Ann M. Powell (1796-)
        1. Phebe E. Haines (1829-)
        2. Matthew S. Haines (1831-)
        3. Abraham Haines (1839-1920)
      4.  Nehemiah Merritt Haines m. Jerusha (1804-1849) 
        1. Solomon S. Haines (1830-1849) 
      5. Peter Haines (1806-1842)
      6. Joseph Haines (1806-1888) m. Elizabeth Powell

Saturday, April 27, 2013

The Widow Haines House


Today a local historian showed me the Widow Haines house on an 1851 map. Then I drove by it. It still exists!